Need help? Ask an expert your product and hand safety questions
Need help? Ask an expert your product and hand safety questions
Understand how EN 388 and ANSI/ISEA 138 differ in scope, impact protection, testing, labeling and buyer requirements when selecting industrial safety gloves.
EN 388 is a broader mechanical-risk glove standard covering characteristics such as abrasion, cut, tear, puncture and, where applicable, impact. ANSI/ISEA 138 specifically focuses on impact-resistant gloves and provides a three-level impact classification based on transmitted force.
The two systems overlap on impact protection, but their ratings are not directly interchangeable.
EN 388 is used for protective gloves against mechanical risks. It provides information about several mechanical-performance characteristics rather than focusing exclusively on impact.
EN 388 addresses mechanical hazards including abrasion, blade cut, tear, puncture and, where applicable, impact.
Where the applicable impact requirement is passed, the EN 388 marking uses P to indicate the impact result.
| Protection Property | What It Addresses |
|---|---|
| Abrasion | Resistance to surface wear. |
| Blade Cut | Resistance to cutting by a blade. |
| Tear | Resistance to tearing. |
| Puncture | Resistance to penetration by a probe. |
| ISO 13997 Cut | Additional cut-performance classification. |
| Impact | Applicable impact assessment represented by P when passed. |
Show a technical EN 388 marking with callouts identifying abrasion, cut, tear, puncture, additional cut performance and impact.
ALT: EN 388 mechanical protection glove marking explained
ANSI/ISEA 138-2019 is an American standard specifically addressing the performance and classification of impact-resistant gloves.
The classification is based on mean transmitted force. A lower transmitted-force limit represents greater impact attenuation.
ANSI/ISEA 138 evaluates defined impact locations on the glove, including areas around the knuckles and fingers/thumb. The classification gives buyers additional information when comparing impact performance.
The standards overlap around impact protection, but they communicate different types of performance information.
| Feature | EN 388 | ANSI/ISEA 138 |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Purpose | Mechanical-risk glove protection | Impact-resistant glove performance |
| System | European EN framework | U.S. ANSI/ISEA framework |
| Abrasion | Yes | Not its primary scope |
| Cut | Yes | Not its primary scope |
| Tear | Yes | Not its primary scope |
| Puncture | Yes | Not its primary scope |
| Impact | Yes, where applicable | Core purpose |
| Impact Rating | Pass indication: P | Levels 1, 2 and 3 |
| Impact Detail | Limited compared with ANSI/ISEA 138 | Graded transmitted-force classification |
In the EN 388 marking system, the letter P in the applicable impact position indicates that the glove passed the relevant impact requirement.
ANSI/ISEA 138 provides three impact-performance levels based on transmitted force. Level 3 permits the lowest transmitted force of the three classifications.
A marking such as the following communicates multiple mechanical-performance results:
The individual positions relate to different mechanical performance characteristics, while P identifies the applicable impact result.
An ANSI/ISEA 138 marking may identify:
This represents the highest of the three ANSI/ISEA 138 impact-performance classifications based on the applicable transmitted-force criteria.
Create a two-column “How to Read EN 388 and ANSI/ISEA 138 Glove Markings” infographic showing the EN 388 mechanical positions, P for impact, and ANSI/ISEA 138 Levels 1–3.
Impact protection is only one component of hand protection. The correct glove depends on the complete hazard profile of the task.
A glove should be selected according to the actual workplace hazards and operational requirements. Impact protection, cut resistance, dexterity, fit, grip and durability may all influence the final selection.
Before purchasing impact-resistant industrial gloves, procurement teams should verify actual performance requirements rather than relying only on marketing terminology.
Consider a maintenance worker who regularly handles heavy metal components and works around machinery.
The buyer should identify the complete hazard profile before selecting a glove.
The buyer can then evaluate the glove’s EN 388 mechanical performance information and, where relevant, its ANSI/ISEA 138 impact classification.
EN 388 provides a broader mechanical-risk framework covering multiple glove performance characteristics, including impact where applicable.
ANSI/ISEA 138 specifically classifies impact-resistant glove performance using Levels 1–3 based on transmitted force.
Impact performance can be influenced by glove construction, material selection, protective-zone design, fit and manufacturing consistency.
For OEM, ODM, private-label and wholesale buyers, discussing the intended hazard profile with the manufacturer can help establish an appropriate product specification.
Protekta Gloves is an industrial safety glove manufacturer supporting OEM, ODM, private-label and wholesale supply from Sialkot, Pakistan.
No. EN 388 is a broader standard for protective gloves against mechanical risks, while ANSI/ISEA 138 specifically classifies impact-resistant glove performance. Their impact results should not be treated as direct equivalents.
The P in the applicable impact position of an EN 388 marking indicates that the glove passed the relevant impact requirement.
They are impact-performance classifications based on transmitted force. Level 1 permits mean transmitted force up to 9 kN, Level 2 up to 6.5 kN and Level 3 up to 4 kN.
For impact attenuation under the ANSI/ISEA 138 classification, Level 3 represents the higher performance classification because it permits less transmitted force than Level 1.
Yes. The EN 388 mechanical-risk framework addresses characteristics including abrasion, blade cut, tear, puncture and, where applicable, impact.
Yes. A glove can be documented against both systems when the applicable testing and product requirements have been met. The two markings provide different information.
No. ANSI/ISEA 138 is not a replacement for EN 388. They belong to different standardization frameworks and address different scopes.
No. Impact and cut protection are separate performance characteristics. Buyers should review applicable cut-resistance information separately.
Not necessarily. The appropriate level depends on the assessed workplace hazard, application, glove design and other requirements such as dexterity and fit.
Yes. ISO 23388:2018 remains a published international standard for protective gloves against mechanical risks, while ISO currently lists a revised edition as under development.
EN 388 and ANSI/ISEA 138 provide different pieces of information. Evaluate the complete hazard profile, applicable market requirements and supporting technical documentation before selecting an industrial safety glove.