Need help? Ask an expert your product and hand safety questions
Need help? Ask an expert your product and hand safety questions
Understand how ANSI/ISEA 138 classifies impact-resistant gloves, what Levels 1–3 mean, and how to evaluate ratings when selecting industrial hand protection.
ANSI/ISEA 138-2019 is an American standard for the performance, classification, and labeling of impact-resistant gloves. It evaluates how effectively a glove’s back-of-hand protection dissipates impact forces around the knuckles and fingers.
The standard gives PPE buyers a common way to compare impact protection rather than relying only on marketing descriptions. It is specifically concerned with impact-resistant gloves.
Show the dorsal hand, knuckle areas, and finger/thumb protection zones evaluated under ANSI/ISEA 138.
Before ANSI/ISEA 138-2019, impact-resistant glove claims were harder to compare because there was no U.S. standard specifically classifying dorsal impact protection.
The standard was developed to help employers make more informed glove selections for work involving impact hazards. It is relevant to applications such as automotive work, construction, heavy equipment, cargo handling, oil and gas, and towing or transportation.
It is important to distinguish ANSI/ISEA 138 from ANSI/ISEA 105, which addresses hand-protection selection criteria including cut, abrasion, chemical, and flame resistance. ANSI/ISEA 138 is specifically concerned with impact-resistant gloves.
What does an impact rating tell you?
The rating indicates how much impact force is transmitted through
the glove’s protective material during standardized testing.
A lower transmitted-force result means better impact performance.
The standard evaluates protection over the knuckles and fingers/thumb separately. A controlled impact is applied to the protective material, and the force transmitted through it is measured.
A typical test description uses a 2.5 kg mass and 5 joules of impact energy. Testing is performed at multiple locations on the fingers and knuckles, and the results are used to determine the glove’s classification.
A standardized impact is applied to the protective material.
The force passing through the protection is measured in kN.
Results determine the applicable impact-performance level.
The back of the hand is not one uniform protection zone. A glove may perform differently around the knuckles, finger joints, and thumb. Separate testing helps identify those differences rather than treating all areas as identical.
Buyer note: Do not treat a supplier’s best-performing impact zone as proof that every tested area achieves the same level. For procurement, request the complete test report and confirm the reported performance for the relevant zones.
ANSI/ISEA 138 uses three performance levels. The classification is based on transmitted force: the lower the measured force, the higher the protection level.
Lower impact-performance classification.
Intermediate impact-performance classification.
Highest impact-performance classification.
| Performance level | Mean transmitted force | Maximum force for all impacts |
|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | < 9 kN | < 11.3 kN |
| Level 2 | < 6.5 kN | < 8.1 kN |
| Level 3 | < 4 kN | < 5 kN |
These are the published ANSI/ISEA 138-2019 classification thresholds. They are not percentages of protection and should not be interpreted as a direct guarantee of injury prevention.
Level 1 is the lowest classification in the ANSI/ISEA 138 scale. It represents gloves that meet the standard’s lower impact-performance threshold. It may be suitable where the assessed impact hazard is relatively limited, but selection should still be based on the actual task and risk assessment.
Level 2 indicates stronger impact performance than Level 1, with a lower transmitted-force threshold. It is a useful classification for buyers comparing gloves intended for more demanding impact exposure. The correct choice still depends on the work hazard, glove construction, and other required protection.
Level 3 is the highest ANSI/ISEA 138 classification. It has the lowest permitted transmitted-force thresholds of the three levels. This makes it the strongest classification for impact performance under the standard, but it does not automatically mean the glove is suitable for every industrial hazard.
A compliant impact glove should have the relevant impact-performance marking on the glove or its attached label. The rating helps identify the glove’s classification, but buyers should also review the underlying test documentation.
Imagine a glove’s test report shows:
The glove’s overall classification is Level 2, because the lower-performing area determines the glove’s classification.
Show separate knuckle and finger/thumb results, with the lower performance level determining the overall classification. Mark the visual as an illustrative example, not a real certification label.
TPR stands for thermoplastic rubber. It is commonly used as molded impact-protection material on the back of industrial work gloves. TPR can be formed into protective zones over the knuckles and fingers, helping the glove absorb and distribute impact energy.
However, TPR itself is not an ANSI/ISEA 138 rating. The rating belongs to the tested glove and its impact-protection performance. A glove with TPR should not automatically be assumed to meet Level 1, 2, or 3.
| Material or feature | What it contributes | What buyers should check |
|---|---|---|
| TPR | Molded impact-protection zones | Actual ANSI/ISEA 138 rating and test data |
| Textile or synthetic glove body | Fit, dexterity, and support for protective zones | Compatibility with the task and other hazards |
| Leather glove body | Material and construction suited to particular applications | Relevant impact, cut, abrasion, and other performance requirements |
| Reinforced protection zones | Added protection in targeted areas | Whether the reinforcement has been tested and documented |
Impact protection is only one part of glove selection. A glove can have a strong impact rating but still be unsuitable for a task involving cuts, punctures, chemicals, heat, or other hazards.
| Rating or standard | Main purpose | What it does not tell you |
|---|---|---|
| ANSI/ISEA 138 | Impact-resistant glove classification | Whether the glove meets every other PPE requirement |
| ANSI/ISEA 105 | Hand-protection selection criteria | A glove’s specific ANSI/ISEA 138 impact classification |
| EN 388 | European mechanical-risk protection marking | Automatic equivalence to ANSI/ISEA 138 levels |
Do not assume that an EN 388 impact rating and an ANSI/ISEA 138 impact level are interchangeable. They are separate standards with different classification systems.
Compare ANSI/ISEA 138, ANSI/ISEA 105, and EN 388. Explain that one rating does not replace a complete hazard assessment.
The correct impact level should be selected according to the hazards of the job, not simply by choosing the highest number available. A hazard assessment should identify the type of impact exposure and determine which combination of protection is required.
A procurement team is comparing two gloves for a work environment with back-of-hand impact exposure.
Glove B has the higher impact-performance classification under the standard. However, the buyer should still compare fit, other hazard protection, product specifications, and whether the glove is appropriate for the specific task.
For Protekta’s product range, relevant examples may include impact-resistant work gloves, TPR-backed industrial gloves, and other glove designs intended for applications where back-of-hand impact protection is required.
Product-level claims should be supported by the actual specification and test documentation for each glove.
Show the front, back, palm, TPR protection zones, cuff, and material close-up using a real Protekta product only when its specifications are verified.
For B2B glove buyers, manufacturing expertise matters because impact performance depends on the complete glove design, not just the appearance of a molded protective panel. Material selection, construction, product development, and quality assurance all contribute to a glove’s suitability for its intended application.
Protekta Gloves can use its manufacturing, OEM, ODM, private-label, sampling, and quality-assurance experience to support buyers with product development and sourcing decisions where relevant. Specific performance claims should be tied to the actual product specification and supporting documentation.
ANSI/ISEA 138 is a U.S. standard for classifying the impact performance of gloves designed to protect the back of the hand and fingers. It uses three levels based on transmitted impact force. Level 1 is the lowest classification and Level 3 is the highest.
Yes. Level 3 has a lower permitted transmitted-force threshold than Level 2, so it represents higher impact performance under the standard. It does not automatically mean the glove is suitable for every hazard.
Yes. The standard evaluates the fingers/thumb and knuckles separately. A glove’s overall classification reflects the lower-performing area.
The classification is based on the lowest performance level among the tested areas. This prevents a glove from being presented as a higher-rated product when one relevant zone performs at a lower level.
No. EN 388 and ANSI/ISEA 138 are different standards. Their impact classifications should not be treated as direct equivalents.
No. TPR is a protective material commonly used in impact gloves, but the actual ANSI/ISEA 138 classification depends on the glove’s tested performance.
Start with a hazard assessment and identify the type of impact exposure. Then compare the glove’s ANSI/ISEA 138 classification, other required protection, fit, and supporting test evidence.
Yes. The same classification does not mean two gloves are identical in construction, fit, durability, or other protection characteristics. Buyers should compare the full product specification and relevant test documentation.
Show an impact-resistant glove beside a generic test-report document, without fake certification logos or invented test results.